Councillor Vaughan
welcomed Dr William Oldfield, Deputy Medical Director
Claire Braithwaite,
Divisional Director of Operations, Medicine and Integrated Care,
Mick Fisher, Head of Public Affairs, from Imperial College
Healthcare NHS Trust. The Trust managed
a number of A& E services that included emergency departments
(ED), urgent care centres (UCC) and
specialist emergency centres, located at St Marys and Charing Cross
hospitals. This had been a challenging
winter period nationally but a month on month improvement had
occurred through the period December 2016 to March 2017, with a new
acute service commencing at Charing Cross. It was noted that a new UCC had become operational at St Marys in April
2016, operated by Vocare. Dr Oldfield explained that they were remodelling
critical care facilities and that they were signs of improved
quality of services. The following key
points of the discussion were noted:
- This had been a challenging winter,
with target of seeing 95% of patients being seen within fours not
being met. On average, 87% of patients
were seen within four-hour, however, there was demonstrable
trajectory of improvement from December onwards;
- With reference to figure 5, in
paragraph 4.2 of the report, it was noted that during 2017, the
position showed much improvement, when compared with Feb-March of
the previous year;
- In terms of key challenges, it was
recognised that contrary to media reports, most patients presenting
at A&E sites need to be
there. There were increasing numbers
arriving by ambulance, which also presented significant operational
challenges;
- Remodelling of care at St Marys
UCC had experienced short terms
operational difficulties, with the result that that the streaming
services (to either UCC or ED)
experienced difficulty with managing extended wait times,
delivering consistent streamlining services and maintaining
adequate staff levels, particularly overnight;
- There had been significant changes
to improve UCC with an extending
programme of work to improve resilience targeting not only
A&E, but the range of service
provision from when a patient first presents to
discharge. Regular weekly meetings now
monitored projects and required actions, with scrutiny and support
from senior officers;
- The Trust acknowledged that they had
not met the required standard but there was improvement;
- Dr Oldfield referred to a funnel
affect, with large numbers of patients accessing service through
single point. Remodelling to maximise
available space, calculating demand and resources, particularly
staff, accordingly would see this become more
streamlined. Emergency medicine was
hard, with staff requiring significant experience – taking up
to 15 years to train an emergency consultant - in what was a highly
pressurised, challenging environment;
- Difficulty in accessing other
services could indicate a causal link to increased A&E attendance, particularly with some waiting
periods of up to 18 weeks recorded for Referral to
Treatment. Members of the Committee
highlighted the point that vulnerable and elderly residents
struggle to access GPs and how easy was it for people to access
primary care in the community.
Although it was noted that this was outside of the Trusts remit, it
was understood that despite the wait, a patient who presented
through an A&E service would
eventually be seen within 14 hours by a consultant and receive a
senior opinion on their condition; and
- Hospital based Social Workers were
now accompanying consultants on their rounds, offering joined up
patient care pathways, with discharge plans being formulated far
early and sufficiently in advance of discharge to avoid delay.
An increase of Type
1 cases at Charing Cross was cause for concern, however, the
Committee acknowledged that the level of demand caused significant
pressure on the service, with the Trust unable to meet the national
standard to see, treat and discharge 95% of patients that present
to an urgent or emergency care setting within 4 hours.
Members of the
Committee highlighted additional concerns around the length of
waiting time, particularly at Western Eye Hospital, where waiting
times of up to five hours had been experienced. The Committee would welcome closer analysis of
public health education provision, which might potentially address
this, together with a better understanding of how to achieve
greater efficiencies around triage and initial assessments.
The Committee was
disappointed that the waiting time targets had not been
met. However, it welcomed the fact that
the Trust had plans in place to improve its performance,
particularly at the Charing Cross A&E. And members of
the Committee commended the work of staff working in emergency care
settings, understanding that the service had faced high levels of
demand during this period. The
Committee will be interested in receiving a further report on
A&E waiting times later in 2017 to
see what impact these changes have made.