Venue: 145 King Street (Ground Floor), Hammersmith, W6 9XY. View directions
Contact: Debbie Yau Email: Debbie.Yau@lbhf.gov.uk
Link: Watch the meeting on YouTube
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Detective Chief Inspector Matt Hogg (Metropolitan Police) and Vincent Law (West London NHS Trust).
Membership Update: The Board appointed Dianne Barham, Chief Executive of Local Voice as its new Healthwatch representative and welcomed Dr Mayada Abu Affan, the new Director of Public Health and John Morley, the new Director of Adult Social Care as its new members.
|
|
|
Declarations of Interest If a Member of the Board, or any other member present in the meeting has a disclosable pecuniary interest in a particular item, whether or not it is entered in the Authority’s register of interests, or any other significant interest which they consider should be declared in the public interest, they should declare the existence and, unless it is a sensitive interest as defined in the Member Code of Conduct, the nature of the interest at the commencement of the consideration of that item or as soon as it becomes apparent.
At meetings where members of the public are allowed to be in attendance and speak, any Member with a disclosable pecuniary interest or other significant interest may also make representations, give evidence or answer questions about the matter. The Member must then withdraw immediately from the meeting before the matter is discussed and any vote taken.
Where members of the public are not allowed to be in attendance and speak, then the Member with a disclosable pecuniary interest should withdraw from the meeting whilst the matter is under consideration. Members who have declared other significant interests should also withdraw from the meeting if they consider their continued participation in the matter would not be reasonable in the circumstances and may give rise to a perception of a conflict of interest.
Members are not obliged to withdraw from the meeting where a dispensation to that effect has been obtained from the Standards Committee. Minutes: There were no declarations of interests.
|
|
|
Minutes and Actions To note the minutes of the previous informal meeting and any outstanding actions. Minutes: The Board noted the minutes of the informal meeting held on 10 September 2025.
In respect of the report on “Better Care Fund Plan 2025-26 and Quarter 1 report 2025-26” discussed at last meeting, the Board agreed to
1. Ratify the planned total expenditure and the proposed schemes in the Better Care Fund Plan for 2025 - 2026 (App.1); 2. Ratify the BCF Quarter 1 report for 2025 – 2026 (App. 2); and 3. Receive an end of year report outlining the outcomes of each scheme and the difference it had made for residents of H&F.
|
|
|
Better Care Fund Quarter 2 Report 2025/26 Additional documents: Minutes: Sarah Bright (Director of People’s Commissioning, Transformation and Partnerships) gave a brief overview of the report. Susan Roostan (H&F ICB Borough Director) added that the Quarter 3 report was being prepared and would be submitted by the end of January.
Sue Spiller (Chief Executive Officer, SOBUS) sought reasons for the overspend of Community Equipment. Sarah Bright responded that there was a recent collapse of the provider appointed by a London consortium comprising 21 local authorities including Hammersmith and Fulham (H&F). The consortium put in place alternative arrangements immediately which inevitably incurred additional costs. The partnership with the new provider with other 7 local authorities across north and northwest London went well particularly with increased efficiency on ways of recycling. It was good to see the market had mobilised a brand-new provider and more improvements were expected as it progressed and established over time.
Councillor Alex Sanderson (Deputy Leader with responsibility for Children and Education) expressed her thanks to the team for working so hard to tackle a difficult and impossible situation of replacing a vanishing provider with a brilliant alternative.
Highlighting Healthwatch’s focus on equalities and particular cohorts, Diane Barham (Healthwatch) suggested gauging user experience of a particular cohort about discharge and community equipment to see if there were any inequalities. Sarah Bright considered the suggestion fit in well with ongoing tasks and agreed to pick it up later.
ACTION: Sarah Bright
RESOLVED Members agreed that
|
|
|
Family Hubs Annual Report 2024/25 Additional documents: Minutes: Philip Tomsett (Head of Family Hubs) presented the report which covered the three Family Hubs across the boroughs in areas of high deprivation. He highlighted the following:
Dr James Cavanagh (H&F GP) noted that H&F Family Hubs were important assets for the community. He asked what could be done to help organisations providing the services to be more involved in the evolution of the neighbourhood.
Philip Tomsett noted that he and his team were involved in various working groups, for example, place-based aspect of the neighbourhood health offer. They also worked closely with local GPs in child health and MDTs. Having good partnerships with key staff within health, the Hubs hoped to extend the partnership approach through various reforms including best starting life and neighbourhood health, bearing in mind not to duplicate service resources but enhance each other’s offers.
Councillor Alex Sanderson (Deputy Leader with responsibility for Children and Education) welcomed the report which witnessed the Family Hubs moving from the pilot phase into a local system with all partnerships from health and voluntary sectors integrating together in co-location working.
Councillor Natalia Perez (Chair of Health and Adult Social Care Policy and Accountability Committee) appreciated the Family Hub model and the positive outcomes. She was concerned about any groups being under-represented in the registration for the service of the Family hubs and steps taken to boost their awareness, e.g. those who were digitally excluded might fail to receive online offers.
Philip Tomsett noted that there was a catchment area for each Family Hub and together with partners’ venues, the whole borough was almost covered except some gaps where the number of families registered was not desirable. The team planned to implement an outreach programme targeting families at those specific areas. Philip further highlighted that physical contact was the first port of call including face-to-face encounters at the Hub premises, and outreach activities at community centres, libraries or partners’ venues. Online services were an additional resource for families.
Recalling the suggestion of the Children and Education Policy and Accountability Committee for the Children’s Service teams to constantly review their comms when reaching out, Jacqui McShannon (Executive Director of People’s Services) commended the Family Hub team which did act on the feedback by seeking other routes beyond the routine of contacting tenants and residents associations.
Summing up, the Chair was impressed by the breath of services offered in the Family ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
|
H&F Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2026-29 Additional documents: Minutes: Dr Mayada Abu Affan (Interim Director of Public Health) gave a brief introduction of H&F Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) 2026-29. She said that every three years, all Health and Wellbeing Boards were statutorily required to publish and regularly update a PNA for their borough. PNA aimed to assist decisions related to community pharmacies noting their additional input to prevention now helped reduce the demand on primary and urgent care. PNA helped the Board to manage the risks in terms of equitable access across the borough as a result of opening new pharmacies and closure or relocation of existing ones.
Susan Hughes (Programme Lead, Public Health) presented the PCN findings. She shared the concerns raised at a recent survey and remarked that the H&F Commission would improve access and experience by addressing opening hours, stock issues and communications on prescriptions readiness among GP, pharmacies and patients. She said that a PNA dashboard would be developed to monitor the trends by logging locations, opening hours and services of pharmacies and the feedback received for each of them. Susan concluded that the LBHF was well served in relation to the number and location of pharmacies and there was a good access to necessary and other relevant pharmaceutical services, with no current or anticipated gaps in provision during 2026-2029.
Sue Spiller (Chief Executive Officer, SOBUS) was concerned about the range of pharmaceutical services that were being taken up by residents. Susan Hughes noted that upon request, a list of available pharmaceutical services had been provided to families visiting Family Hubs. She understood from the survey that some cohorts such as carers might not be aware that local pharmacies did deliver prescriptions and so on. She believed there were some scopes to improve the dissemination of relevant information on the “Pharmacy First” service.
Dr Mayada Abu Affan explained that NHS England which commissioned the pharmaceutical services had the data on the range of services taken up by residents. The Council only received data on the public health services it commissioned to pharmacies and hence there were no sufficient data to assess the impact of pharmaceutical services in reducing primary care demand.
Dr James Cavanagh (H&F GP) noted that the “Pharmacy First” service was commissioned by NHS England and widely broadcast/advertised through GP surgeries and that a large cohort of pharmacists in H&F had joined GP practices through national funding on workforce diversity. He considered it useful to map the number of pharmacists within the Primary Care Networks (PCNs) to understand the supply and service gaps, if any, in the PCNs. Dr Cavanagh sought details about pharmacists delivering medication to people’s homes or working with nursing homes, and the number of prescribing pharmacists in each PCNs. These data would help the Board to understand whether the community was being served with proper access and quality of pharmaceutical services. Dr Mayada Abu Affan considered the issue raised by Dr Cavanagh was very important and could be done in parallel to the PNA.
ACTION: ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
|
Healthwatch Annual Report 2024/25 Minutes: Sarah Bright (Director of People’s Commissioning, Transformation and Partnerships) presented the report 2024/25 which gave an overview of the engagement activities, key issues identified, and recommendations provided by the previous Healthwatch provider. Since September 2025 Healthwatch had been provided by Local Voice in the Community. The report also looked ahead to opportunities for exploring deeper collaboration with Healthwatch and health partners, aligning priorities where possible, sharing insights, and embedding co-production, so that local voices could inform decision-making and support measurable improvements in health and social care.
Caroline Farrar (HCP Managing Director) remarked that the new Healthwatch provider had identified three ongoing priorities from the annual report that would be progressed as areas of focus in 2026. She said that the Partnership would collaborate with Local Voice in the Community to align these priorities and complement the wider health and care work programme, ensuring a unified approach to improving outcomes for residents.
Diane Barham (Healthwatch) added that the Healthwatch was asking for new insights from a bigger pool of information shared by local residents with a view to doing the same thing differently.
RESOLVED That the Board noted the report. |
|
|
Verbal update on ICB Minutes: Sue Roostan ((H&F ICB Borough Director) gave an update on ICB that as of 1st of April, the Northwest London ICB and North Central London ICB would merge to become West and North London ICB which shall be responsible to carry out the statutory functions and meet the statutory requirement for the 13 boroughs it covered.
Sue Roostan noted that the merge shall result in 50% reduction in staff across both ICBs while the new ICB would be expanding its strategic commissioning role as more and different services were commissioned upon request. In parallel to the 45-day staff consultation starting from last December, there had been a voluntary redundancy scheme with staff movements happening between mid-February to end of March 2026 and expected to continue probably until the first quarter of 2027.
Sue Roostan emphasised that while the best efforts would be made to ensure seamless transformation with business as usual, there would be changes in terms of ways of delivering those statutory functions during the process when the new ICB took up its role as a payer of services. Sue said that the full range of providers including partners, voluntary community sectors and the local authority as well as those in the Primary Care Networks would continue and focus on neighbourhood health with local accountability met through the new integrated neighbourhood teams. Discussions on transferring the statutory functions to the new structure were ongoing. While huge changes were expected, Sue was committed to keeping the Partnership and this Board updated. (42.46 - 48.36)
Sue Spiller (Chief Executive Officer, SOBUS) thanked the efforts of everyone involved in the transition delivering the job day-to-day despite the future uncertainty.
Dr James Cavanagh (H&F GP) expressed concern about the fundamental change of the transformation. Under the existing system, health providers were responsible to deliver the contracts entered with the commissioners who decided what were the right way to serve the needs of the population. The new ICB would set out the strategic goals determined by the high-level Integrated Care System for the providers to deliver. It might be opportunities but there might also be potential weaknesses.
In reply to the question of Councillor Helen Rowbottom (Chair of the Children and Education Policy and Accountability Committee) on the opportunities for the frontline delivery to align their expertise, Dr James Cavanagh acknowledged the transformation being a much more of an opportunity than a threat in LBHF given its extremely good organisations and oversight in service delivery by committed professionals. He compared and contrasted the current and new systems below:
|
|
|
Work Programme To discuss the Board’s work programme and suggest items for future meetings. Minutes: The Chair noted that members and partners were welcome to email suggestions for the work programme to the clerk.
|
|
|
Dates of Future Meetings To note the following dates of future meetings: · 18 March 2026 · 22 June 2026 Minutes: The following dates of future meetings were noted:-
· 18 March 2026 · 22 June 2026 </AI10> <TRAILER_SECTION>
|