Agenda and minutes

Venue: Main Hall (1st Floor) - 3 Shortlands, Hammersmith, W6 8DA. View directions

Contact: Charles Francis, Committee Cordinator 

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

 

2.

Declaration of Interests

If a Councillor has a disclosable pecuniary interest in a particular item, whether or not it is entered in the Authority’s register of interests, or any other significant interest which they consider should be declared in the public interest, they should declare the existence and, unless it is a sensitive interest as defined in the Member Code of Conduct, the nature of the interest at the commencement of the consideration of that item or as soon as it becomes apparent.

 

At meetings where members of the public are allowed to be in attendance and speak, any Councillor with a disclosable pecuniary interest or other significant interest may also make representations, give evidence or answer questions about the matter.  The Councillor must then withdraw immediately from the meeting before the matter is discussed and any vote taken.

 

Where Members of the public are not allowed to be in attendance and speak, then the Councillor with a disclosable pecuniary interest should withdraw from the meeting whilst the matter is under consideration. Councillors who have declared other significant interests should also withdraw from the meeting if they consider their continued participation in the matter would not be reasonable in the circumstances and may give rise to a perception of a conflict of interest.

 

Councillors are not obliged to withdraw from the meeting where a dispensation to that effect has been obtained from the Standards Committee.

Minutes:

Councillor Wesley Harcourt declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to Items 5 (2023/00747/OPDOBS ), 6 (2023/01911/OPDOBS) and 7 (2023/01912/OPDOBS) as he sits on the OPDC Planning Committee. He remained in the meeting but did not participate or vote on the items.

 

3.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 239 KB

To approve as an accurate record, and the Chair to sign, the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 18 July 2023.

Minutes:

 

The minutes of the previous meeting held on 18 July 2023 were agreed as an accurate record, subject to amending Item 8  - FLAT GROUND AND FIRST FLOORS, 90 DEVONPORT ROAD, from “The Committee voted on the 2 reasons for approval set out above as follows:” to “The Committee voted on the 3 reasons for approval set out above as follows:”.

 

4.

Cumberland Lodge, 21 Cumberland Crescent, London W14 8XB, Avonmore, 2022/03244/FUL pdf icon PDF 417 KB

Minutes:

An addendum was circulated prior to the meeting that modified the report. Neil Egerton presented the item.

 

The agent spoke in support of the application.

 

The Committee voted on the officer recommendations as amended by the Addendum as follows:

 

Recommendation 1:

 

FOR                        Unanimous

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

Recommendation 2:

 

FOR:                      Unanimous

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

RESOLVED

 

1.    That the Director of Planning and Property be authorised to grant permission subject to the condition(s) listed  in the report to committee as modified by the Addendum.

 

2.    That the Director of Planning and Property, after consultation with the Assistant Director Legal Services and the Chair of the Planning and Development Control Committee be authorised to make any minor changes to the proposed conditions, which may include the variation, addition or deletion of conditions, any such changes shall be within their discretion.

 

 

5.

3 School Road, London, NW10 6TD, Outside Borough Boundary, 2023/00747/OPDOBS pdf icon PDF 372 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Wesley Harcourt declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to Items 5 (2023/00747/OPDOBS ), 6 (2023/01911/OPDOBS) and 7 (2023/01912/OPDOBS) as he sits on the OPDC Planning Committee. He remained in the meeting but did not participate or vote on the items.

 

An addendum was circulated prior to the meeting that modified the report. Ieuan Bellis presented the item. There were no registered speakers.

 

The Committee voted on the officer recommendation as follows:

 

Recommendation 1:

 

 

FOR:                      4

AGAINST:               3

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

 

RESOLVED

 

The Council raises an objection to the proposed development for the following

reason:

 

Townscape Impacts: The proposed development is considered to represent harm to the townscape of Hammersmith and Fulham, namely key views within Wormwood Scrubs. This townscape harm would result in a medium/high degree of change within key views and result in moderate/adverse townscape impacts.

 

 

6.

Old Oak Common Station, Old Oak Common Lane, London, NW10 6DZ, College Park & Old Oak, 2023/01911/OPDOBS pdf icon PDF 786 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Wesley Harcourt declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to Items 5 (2023/00747/OPDOBS ), 6 (2023/01911/OPDOBS) and 7 (2023/01912/OPDOBS) as he sits on the OPDC Planning Committee. He remained in the meeting but did not participate or vote on the items.

 

An addendum was circulated prior to the meeting that modified the report. Ieuan Bellis presented the item. There were no registered speakers.

 

The Committee voted on the officer recommendations to object on the grounds set out in the report to committee  as follows:

 

 

Recommendation 1:

 

FOR:                      7

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

Recommendation 2:

 

FOR:                      7

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

 

RESOLVED

 

The Council raises an objection to the proposed development for the following

reason(s):

 

Recommendation 1 – The proposed train crew and catering building would be in the area safeguard for a future east/west vehicular/pedestrian bridge (known as Old Oak Bridge). Furthermore, the proposed new building and associated works would be located within the alignment of the proposed east/west Old Oak Bridge. Insufficient details have been provided to demonstrate that alternative locations have been considered for the crew facilities.

 

 

The Council raises an objection to the proposed development for the following

reason(s):

 

Recommendation 2 – The proposed location of the crew and catering building results in the loss of the proposed cycle hub for 745 cycle parking spaces safeguarded in the previously approved Schedule 17 application (ref. 22/0064/HS2OPDC) and the current proposals do not include the re-provision of the safeguarded 745 cycle parking spaces.

 

 

7.

Old Oak Common Station, Old Oak Common Lane, London, NW10 6DZ, College Park & Old Oak, 2023/01912/OPDOBS pdf icon PDF 784 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Wesley Harcourt declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to Items 5 (2023/00747/OPDOBS ), 6 (2023/01911/OPDOBS) and 7 (2023/01912/OPDOBS) as he sits on the OPDC Planning Committee. He remained in the meeting but did not participate or vote on the items.

 

An addendum was circulated prior to the meeting that modified the report. Ieuan Bellis presented the item. There were no registered speakers.

 

The Committee voted on the officer recommendations to object on the grounds set out in the report to committee as follows:

 

Recommendation 1:

 

FOR:                      7

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

 

Recommendation 2:

 

FOR:                      7

AGAINST:               0

NOT VOTING:        0

 

RESOLVED

 

The Council raises an objection to the proposed development for the following

reason(s):

 

Recommendation 1 – The objections raised previously in relation to the Schedule 17 public realm application (ref. 22/0064/HS2OPDC) still apply. There remain concerns with regards to safeguarding a future connection to the east, and in relation to the proposed urban realm layout and public transport interchange, particularly in relation to pedestrian and cycle access and movement.

 

 

The Council raises an objection to the proposed development for the following

reason(s):

 

Recommendation 2 – The proposed location of the crew and catering building results in the loss of the proposed cycle hub for 745 cycle parking spaces safeguarded in the previously approved Schedule 17 application (ref. 22/0064/HS2OPDC) and the current proposals do not include the re-provision of the safeguarded 745 cycle parking spaces.

 

 

Addendum pdf icon PDF 68 KB

 

Translate this website